Stockbridge Iron Co. v. Cone Iron Works

99 Mass. 468
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 Mass. 468 (Stockbridge Iron Co. v. Cone Iron Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stockbridge Iron Co. v. Cone Iron Works, 99 Mass. 468 (Mass. 1868).

Opinion

Wells, J.

The jurisdiction of this court is exclusive over all actions in which relief in equity is prayed for. St. 1853, c. 371. Gen. Sts. c. 113, § 1. The prayer for relief gives jurisdiction of the action, and therefore no affidavit is necessary. Its character is that of a suit in equity. Irvin v. Gregory, 13 Gray, 215. Gen. Sts. c. 113, § 3. If a prayer for relief is improperly coupled with an action at law, it may be defeated by a demurrer. Harvey v. De Witt, 13 Gray, 536. No such question 18 raised by this motion to dismiss.

Decree overruling the motion to dismiss affiimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Worthington v. Waring
20 L.R.A. 342 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 Mass. 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stockbridge-iron-co-v-cone-iron-works-mass-1868.