Stock v. Regan

29 A.D.3d 675, 813 N.Y.S.2d 676

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for quantum meruit, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and promissory estoppel, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Vitaliano, J.), dated August 11, 2005, which denied her motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8) to dismiss the action for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

[676] The plaintiff alleges that the defendant, a resident of the State of Georgia, contracted for the performance of services in the State of New York (see CPLR 302 [a] [1]; Courtroom Tel. Network v Focus Media, 264 AD2d 351 [1999]; Alan Lupton Assoc. v Northeast Plastics, 105 AD2d 3 [1984]). Therefore, the defendant’s motion to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8) for lack of personal jurisdiction was properly denied. Goldstein, J.P., Mastro, Rivera and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stock v. Regan, 29 A.D.3d 675, 813 N.Y.S.2d 676 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

29 A.D.3d 675 (Stock v. Regan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alan Lupton Associates, Inc. v. Northeast Plastics, Inc.
105 A.D.2d 3 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Courtroom Television Network v. Focus Media, Inc.
264 A.D.2d 351 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)