Stobo v. Kinloch

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Stobo v. Kinloch

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 315

CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina

DecidedNovember 12, 1724

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 315 (Stobo v. Kinloch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stobo v. Kinloch, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 315 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1724).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon Motion of Mr. Hargrave being of the Complainants Counsel, in the presence of Mr. Whitaker of the Defendant’s Counsel; Forasmuch as it was alledged by the Complainant’s Counsel, that there had been a Treaty between the said Parties, and that the Complainants being in hopes to accommodate the matter in an amicable way, have delayed the prosecution of their Suit, in this Court, and entered into mutual Bonds of Arbitration, with the Defendant, of and concerning all matters in Controversy: And Therefore prayed That the said Arbitration Bonds exhibited and filed in this honourable Court may be made Orders of this Court; It was thereupon Ordered by this Court, by and with the consent of the Defendant’s Counsel, That the aforesaid Bonds be accordingly made and Established Orders of this Court.

Intr.

Cn: Southack Deputy Register

Present Also The honourable James Kinloch Esq, of His Majesty’s Council.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon Motion of Mr. Hargrave being of the Complainants Counsel, in the presence of Mr. Whitaker of the Defendant’s Counsel; Forasmuch as it was alledged by the Complainant’s Counsel, that there had been a Treaty between the said Parties, and that the Complainants being in hopes to accommodate the matter in an amicable way, have delayed the prosecution of their Suit, in this Court, and entered into mutual Bonds of Arbitration, with the Defendant, of and concerning all matters in Controversy: And Therefore prayed That the said Arbitration Bonds exhibited and filed in this honourable Court may be made Orders of this Court; It was thereupon Ordered by this Court, by and with the consent of the Defendant’s Counsel, That the aforesaid Bonds be accordingly made and Established Orders of this Court.

Intr.

Cn: Southack Deputy Register

Present Also The honourable James Kinloch Esq, of His Majesty’s Council.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stobo-v-kinloch-ctchansc-1724.