S.T.L. v. State

194 So. 3d 577, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10190, 2016 WL 3569568
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 1, 2016
DocketNo. 2D15-3964
StatusPublished

This text of 194 So. 3d 577 (S.T.L. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
S.T.L. v. State, 194 So. 3d 577, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10190, 2016 WL 3569568 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we find no error in the disposition or the sentence, but we [578]*578remand for the circuit court to correct a scrivener’s error in the disposition order. S.T.L. entered a plea of no contest to the offenses of possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia. The circuit court withheld adjudication and gave her a judicial warning.. However, the following three options are checked on the disposition order: “Adjudication of delinquency is withheld,” “The child is adjudicated delinquent,” and “The child is given a Judicial Warning.” The disposition order is remanded for the circuit court to correct the scrivener’s error to reflect that adjudication of delinquency was withheld and the child was given a judicial warning.

Affirmed; remanded to correct scrivener’s error.

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 So. 3d 577, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10190, 2016 WL 3569568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stl-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.