Stivers Admr. v. Potters Admr.

5 Ky. Op. 99, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 217
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedMarch 16, 1872
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Ky. Op. 99 (Stivers Admr. v. Potters Admr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stivers Admr. v. Potters Admr., 5 Ky. Op. 99, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 217 (Ky. Ct. App. 1872).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Pryor :

The law requires an affidavit by the claimant' of the justice of the demand for the protection of the decedent’s estate, and to enable the personal representative to form some idea of -its correctness before he pays it.

Dishman, for appellant. James, for appellee.

If a voucher against a decedent’s, estate is made out and proven according to law, this does not preclude ithe executor or administrator from contesting it, and in a case like this, when an issue is formed and a jury sworn to determine that issue, the ex parte statements made in 'the form of affidavits cannot be read as evidence without the consent of the parties. ■

The court erred in refusing to exclude the affidavits upon the motion of the attorney for the appellant. The judgment of the court below is reversed and cause remanded with directions to set aside the verdict of the jury and award to the appellants a new trial and for further proceeding's consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Ky. Op. 99, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stivers-admr-v-potters-admr-kyctapp-1872.