Stiver v. Stiver
This text of 3 Ohio 19 (Stiver v. Stiver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The single question to be decided in this case is, whether an error in rendering judgment in the Supreme Court can be corrected by the court of common pleas, or by this court on bill in equity? And we are of opinion that it can not be so corrected. [15]*15If the error be a judicial one, and has been committed by a court of the last resort, no means is provided for its correction, unless it can be corrected by motion, or upon writ of error, coram nobis. It is dangerous to attribute errors, which the record imports to be judicial, to the clerk. But if the court at law, where they are made, can not rectify them without departing from established principles, that circumstance can not give jurisdiction to a court ■of chancery.
The bill must be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Ohio 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stiver-v-stiver-ohio-1827.