Stitt v. U.S. Department of Education
This text of 621 F. App'x 262 (Stitt v. U.S. Department of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Monica Stitt appeals from the district court’s order upholding the bankruptcy [263]*263court’s determination that her student loan debt was not dischargeable in her bankruptcy case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Stitt’s motions for judicial notice and her motions to rescind the orders deferring consideration of her motions for judicial notice, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stitt v. U.S. Dep't of Educ., No. 8:14-cv-00938-PJM (D.Md. filed June 9, 2015; entered June 16, 2015). We deny Stitt’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
621 F. App'x 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stitt-v-us-department-of-education-ca4-2015.