Stitt v. Stitt

California Supreme Court

Stitt v. Stitt

5 Cal. 2d 329

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 13, 1936

DocketL. A. No. 15376

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Cal. 2d 329 (Stitt v. Stitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stitt v. Stitt, 5 Cal. 2d 329 (Cal. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Respondent has moved for a diminution of the record in order to bring before this court an order, made by the trial court subsequent to the filing of the transcript here, correcting certain typographical errors which occurred in the findings as originally signed.

[330]*330It sufficiently appears that the correction was properly made by the lower court, and that it is necessary to a complete understanding of the record that the order making the corrections be now brought up and made a part of the record on appeal.

The motion for diminution is therefore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Respondent has moved for a diminution of the record in order to bring before this court an order, made by the trial court subsequent to the filing of the transcript here, correcting certain typographical errors which occurred in the findings as originally signed.

[330]*330It sufficiently appears that the correction was properly made by the lower court, and that it is necessary to a complete understanding of the record that the order making the corrections be now brought up and made a part of the record on appeal.

The motion for diminution is therefore granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Cal. 2d 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stitt-v-stitt-cal-1936.