Stitt v. Brendel

Illinois Supreme Court

Stitt v. Brendel

66 Ill. 343

DecidedSeptember 15, 1872

StatusPublished

This text of 66 Ill. 343 (Stitt v. Brendel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stitt v. Brendel, 66 Ill. 343 (Ill. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

There are no written pleadings in this case, and the record contains no bill of exceptions.

The several motions made, and the reasons therefor, are not before us. They form no part of the record, and must be brought before the court by bill of exceptions.

We can only regard, in this record, the verdict and judgment. The judgment is in accordance with the verdict, and we must presume that the verdict was responsive to the issue presented.

There is nothing to show to the contrary, and the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

There are no written pleadings in this case, and the record contains no bill of exceptions.

The several motions made, and the reasons therefor, are not before us. They form no part of the record, and must be brought before the court by bill of exceptions.

We can only regard, in this record, the verdict and judgment. The judgment is in accordance with the verdict, and we must presume that the verdict was responsive to the issue presented.

There is nothing to show to the contrary, and the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 Ill. 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stitt-v-brendel-ill-1872.