Stith v. Pryor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Stith v. Pryor

1934 OK 161, 30 P.2d 670, 167 Okla. 471, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 577

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 13, 1934

Docket24074

StatusPublished

This text of 1934 OK 161 (Stith v. Pryor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stith v. Pryor, 1934 OK 161, 30 P.2d 670, 167 Okla. 471, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 577 (Okla. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On September 10, 1932, this proceeding in error was commenced by the filing of a petition in error with case-made attached complaining of a .judgment rendered wherein L. R. Stith was plaintiff, appellant from a proceeding of Osage county court, and said John Pryor was defendant and appellee.

The plaintiff in error herein seeks reversal of the judgment of the district court entered on the 15th day of March, 1932, affirming the proceedings of the county court of Osage county. On the 8th day of February, 1933, plaintiff in error filed brief herein. The defendant in error has filed no brief herein and has offered no excuse for the failure to do so. Upon the authority of the opinions of this court many times decided, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the judgment of the lower court. The assignments of error are reasonably supported by the authorities cited. The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to the trial court to vacate the order of affirmance entered therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On September 10, 1932, this proceeding in error was commenced by the filing of a petition in error with case-made attached complaining of a .judgment rendered wherein L. R. Stith was plaintiff, appellant from a proceeding of Osage county court, and said John Pryor was defendant and appellee.

The plaintiff in error herein seeks reversal of the judgment of the district court entered on the 15th day of March, 1932, affirming the proceedings of the county court of Osage county. On the 8th day of February, 1933, plaintiff in error filed brief herein. The defendant in error has filed no brief herein and has offered no excuse for the failure to do so. Upon the authority of the opinions of this court many times decided, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the judgment of the lower court. The assignments of error are reasonably supported by the authorities cited. The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to the trial court to vacate the order of affirmance entered therein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1934 OK 161, 30 P.2d 670, 167 Okla. 471, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stith-v-pryor-okla-1934.