Stith v. New York City Housing Authority

235 A.D.2d 209, 690 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 37

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth Thompson, J., and a jury), entered on October 10, 1995, in favor of defendant, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Under the circumstances herein, proximate cause clearly was not established (Wright v New York City Hous. Auth., 208 AD2d 327, 330-331; Kirsten M. v Bettina Equities Co., 222 AD2d 201, lv denied 88 NY2d 813; Rojas v Lynn, 218 AD2d 611, lv denied 87 NY2d 804). Since defendant landlord is not liable, we do not reach the issue concerning the applicability of CPLR article 16. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stith v. New York City Housing Authority, 235 A.D.2d 209, 690 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 37 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

235 A.D.2d 209 (Stith v. New York City Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. New York City Housing Authority
208 A.D.2d 327 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Rojas v. Lynn
218 A.D.2d 611 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Kirsten M. v. Bettina Equities Co.
222 A.D.2d 201 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)