Stirling v. Regents of the University
1 McGrath 1090, 3 Daily L.N. 371
This text of 1 McGrath 1090 (Stirling v. Regents of the University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stirling v. Regents of the University, 1 McGrath 1090, 3 Daily L.N. 371 (Mich. 1896).
Opinion
To compel the board to comply with the provisions of Act No. 257, Laws of 1895, relative to 'the establishment of a Homeopathic Medical College at Detroit.
Denied July 28, 1896, with costs, on the ground that the Attorney General is the proper party relator in such case and that said Act No. 257 is unconstitutional.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 McGrath 1090, 3 Daily L.N. 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stirling-v-regents-of-the-university-mich-1896.