Stirling v. Di Pirro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stirling v. Di Pirro

16 A.D.2d 883, 228 N.Y.S.2d 248, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9614

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 883 (Stirling v. Di Pirro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stirling v. Di Pirro, 16 A.D.2d 883, 228 N.Y.S.2d 248, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9614 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on the law and facts, without costs of this appeal to either party; and order of Erie County Children’s Court affirmed. Memorandum: Children’s Court adjudged the respondent to be the father of the appellant’s children. Upon appeal from the order of that court Special Term reversed and dismissed the petition. There was ample evidence to support the determination of Children’s Court and the reversal thereof by Special Term was erroneous. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term reversing an order of Erie Children’s Court holding that respondent was guilty of nonsupport and referring the matter for financial investigation.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed on the law and facts, without costs of this appeal to either party; and order of Erie County Children’s Court affirmed. Memorandum: Children’s Court adjudged the respondent to be the father of the appellant’s children. Upon appeal from the order of that court Special Term reversed and dismissed the petition. There was ample evidence to support the determination of Children’s Court and the reversal thereof by Special Term was erroneous. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term reversing an order of Erie Children’s Court holding that respondent was guilty of nonsupport and referring the matter for financial investigation.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 883, 228 N.Y.S.2d 248, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stirling-v-di-pirro-nyappdiv-1962.