Stirks v. Johnson & Harris
25 S.E. 648, 99 Ga. 298
This text of 25 S.E. 648 (Stirks v. Johnson & Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stirks v. Johnson & Harris, 25 S.E. 648, 99 Ga. 298 (Ga. 1896).
Opinion
1. When, upon the trial of a claim case, the burden of proof was upon the claimant, he could not successfully carry the same by showing that the ownership of the property, though not in himself,, was in a person other than the defendant in execution.
2. No error was committed on the trial, and the evidence fully warranted the verdict. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bull v. Johnson
12 S.E.2d 96 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Rucker v. Hunt
163 S.E. 612 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Evans Marketing Agency v. Federated Fruit & Vegetable Growers Inc.
152 S.E. 49 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Crawford County Bank v. Britt-Hightower Co.
88 S.E. 691 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Rowland v. Gregg & Son
50 S.E. 949 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Parker & Co. v. Mathews
31 S.E. 784 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 S.E. 648, 99 Ga. 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stirks-v-johnson-harris-ga-1896.