Stirks v. Johnson & Harris
25 S.E. 648, 99 Ga. 298
Opinion
1. When, upon the trial of a claim case, the burden of proof was upon the claimant, he could not successfully carry the same by showing that the ownership of the property, though not in himself,, was in a person other than the defendant in execution.
2. No error was committed on the trial, and the evidence fully warranted the verdict. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stirks v. Johnson & Harris, 25 S.E. 648, 99 Ga. 298 (Ga. 1896).
25 S.E. 648 (Stirks v. Johnson & Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bull v. Johnson
12 S.E.2d 96 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Rucker v. Hunt
163 S.E. 612 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Evans Marketing Agency v. Federated Fruit & Vegetable Growers Inc.
152 S.E. 49 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Crawford County Bank v. Britt-Hightower Co.
88 S.E. 691 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Rowland v. Gregg & Son
50 S.E. 949 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Parker & Co. v. Mathews
31 S.E. 784 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)