Stipes v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Stipes v. State

861 S.W.2d 312, 314 Ark. 352, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 732

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedOctober 4, 1993

DocketCR 93-1008

StatusPublished

This text of 861 S.W.2d 312 (Stipes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stipes v. State, 861 S.W.2d 312, 314 Ark. 352, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 732 (Ark. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

J.W. “Dub” Stipes, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Phyllis B. Worley, admits by motion and brief that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion.- See our Per Curiam opinion In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded' to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

J.W. “Dub” Stipes, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Phyllis B. Worley, admits by motion and brief that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion.- See our Per Curiam opinion In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded' to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

861 S.W.2d 312, 314 Ark. 352, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stipes-v-state-ark-1993.