Stipes v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Stipes v. State

861 S.W.2d 312, 314 Ark. 352, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 732

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stipes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 315 Ark. 719 →

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided October 4, 1993·No. CR 93-1008·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

J.W. “Dub” Stipes, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Phyllis B. Worley, admits by motion and brief that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion.- See our Per Curiam opinion In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded' to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

J.W. “Dub” Stipes, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Phyllis B. Worley, admits by motion and brief that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion.- See our Per Curiam opinion In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded' to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Stipes v. State, 861 S.W.2d 312, 314 Ark. 352, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 732 (Ark. 1993).

Pincite

861 S.W.2d 312 (Stipes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.