Stio v. Montefiore Med. Ctr.
This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 3287 (Stio v. Montefiore Med. Ctr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Stio v Montefiore Med. Ctr. |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 03287 |
| Decided on April 30, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on April 30, 2019
9134N 22250/16
v
Montefiore Medical Center, also known as Montefiore Medical Group, Defendant-Respondent.
Phillips Law Group, P.C., North Salem (Jeffrey E. Phillips of counsel), for appellant.
Yoeli Gottleib & Etra LLP, New York (Michael L. Burke of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura G. Douglas, J.), entered June 22, 2018, which denied plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 2221 "to renew and to vacate" an order, same court and Justice, entered December 7, 2017, on default, dismissing the complaint for failure to comply with a prior discovery order, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The motion court appropriately acknowledged that plaintiff satisfied a showing of excusable default, sufficient to vacate the underlying default. Plaintiff, however, did not show that her claim had merit. The bare-boned bill of particulars is
verified only by an attorney, and there is no other sworn account of the incident.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: APRIL 30, 2019
CLERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 NY Slip Op 3287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stio-v-montefiore-med-ctr-nyappdiv-2019.