Stinson v. State
807 S.W.2d 211, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 536, 1991 WL 56039
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Roger Stinson, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record and find that the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The judgment [212]*212of the trial court is affirmed m accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stinson v. State, 807 S.W.2d 211, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 536, 1991 WL 56039 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).
807 S.W.2d 211 (Stinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.