Stinson v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Stinson v. State

104 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 697

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 26, 1925

Docket4 Div. 26.

StatusPublished

This text of 104 So. 926 (Stinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stinson v. State, 104 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 697 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of assault with intent to murder, and appeals. It would serve no good purpose for us to undertake to make a summary of the evidence. Suffice to say that we have carefully read same en banc, and are of the opinion that under the rule prevailing in this state defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict and award to him a new trial should have been granted. The evidence offered was entirely too weak and inconclusive to support the verdict returned. Let the judgment be reversed, and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of assault with intent to murder, and appeals. It would serve no good purpose for us to undertake to make a summary of the evidence. Suffice to say that we have carefully read same en banc, and are of the opinion that under the rule prevailing in this state defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict and award to him a new trial should have been granted. The evidence offered was entirely too weak and inconclusive to support the verdict returned. Let the judgment be reversed, and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stinson-v-state-alactapp-1925.