Stinson v. Nichols (In re Crosby)

185 B.R. 33, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20629
District Court, S.D. Mississippi·Decided February 18, 1994·No. Civ. A. No. 3:93-cv-318WS; Bankruptcy No. 91-01357-JC; Adv. No. 91-0176-JC·Published

Opinion

[34] ORDER

WINGATE, District Judge.

Before the court is an appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Mississippi filed pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 158(a).1 The appellant is the Omnibank, a defendant in adversarial cause no. 91-0176-JC. The appellees are Marvis and Judith Stinson. A supporting brief has been submitted by the debtors in Bankruptcy Case No. 91-01357-JC, Elton B. and Betty A. Crosby.

This court has reviewed the Memorandum Opinion of the Bankruptcy Judge, the respective briefs of the parties, and the case law and finds that the ruling of the United States Bankruptcy Court in this matter is well taken and supported by adequate authority. Therefore, the judgment of the United States Bankruptcy Judge is hereby affirmed.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stinson v. Nichols (In re Crosby), 185 B.R. 33, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20629 (S.D. Miss. 1994).

185 B.R. 33 (Stinson v. Nichols (In re Crosby)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Appeals
28 U.S.C. § 158(a)