Stinson v. Driggers

136 So. 584, 17 La. App. 398, 1931 La. App. LEXIS 260
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMay 20, 1931
DocketNo. 3659
StatusPublished

This text of 136 So. 584 (Stinson v. Driggers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stinson v. Driggers, 136 So. 584, 17 La. App. 398, 1931 La. App. LEXIS 260 (La. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

DREW, J.

Plaintiff sued on open account and secured judgment in the lower court, as prayed for. Defendant appealed to this court, and during the pendency of the appeal paid and settled the judgment in full. Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for that. reason and appellant’s counsel in this ' court admitted the correctness of the allegations in the motion.

The judgment of the lower court has been fully acquiesced in by appellant and there is nothing before this court. The motion to dismiss the appeal will have to be sustained. It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the appeal taken herein is dismissed, at appellant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 So. 584, 17 La. App. 398, 1931 La. App. LEXIS 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stinson-v-driggers-lactapp-1931.