Stinnett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Stinnett v. State

1912 OK CR 459, 127 P. 1119, 8 Okla. Crim. 731, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 435

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 30, 1912

DocketNo. A-1500.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 459 (Stinnett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stinnett v. State, 1912 OK CR 459, 127 P. 1119, 8 Okla. Crim. 731, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 435 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

FURMAN, P. J.

Judgment was rendered against appellant in the county court of Marshall county for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and his punishment- was assessed at a fine of $50 and imprisonment in the county jail for the period of 30 days. Appealed. Appeal dismissed. On the 13th day of September, 1911, the court granted an order extending the time for perfecting the appeal by filing a transcript of the record in this court on or before the 29th day of November, 1911. But the transcript of the record was not filed in this court until the 2nd day of December, 1911. As the time for perfecting the appeal had elapsed when the transcript of the record was filed in this court we did not acquire jurisdiction of this case and the appeal must therefore be dismissed, with directions to the *732 county court of Marshall county to proceed with the enforcement of its judgment.

DOYLE, J., concurs. ARMSTRONG-, J., absent, and not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FURMAN, P. J.

Judgment was rendered against appellant in the county court of Marshall county for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and his punishment- was assessed at a fine of $50 and imprisonment in the county jail for the period of 30 days. Appealed. Appeal dismissed. On the 13th day of September, 1911, the court granted an order extending the time for perfecting the appeal by filing a transcript of the record in this court on or before the 29th day of November, 1911. But the transcript of the record was not filed in this court until the 2nd day of December, 1911. As the time for perfecting the appeal had elapsed when the transcript of the record was filed in this court we did not acquire jurisdiction of this case and the appeal must therefore be dismissed, with directions to the *732 county court of Marshall county to proceed with the enforcement of its judgment.

DOYLE, J., concurs. ARMSTRONG-, J., absent, and not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 459, 127 P. 1119, 8 Okla. Crim. 731, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stinnett-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.