Stingle's Case

E.D. Pennsylvania

Stingle's Case

23 F. Cas. 107

DecidedSeptember 4, 1863

StatusPublished

This text of 23 F. Cas. 107 (Stingle's Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stingle's Case, 23 F. Cas. 107 (E.D. Pa. 1863).

Pincite

Opinion

Akmy — Liability to Draft — Habeas Corpus.

1. Under the act of March 3, 1863, § 3 (12 Stat. 731], if a married man over thirty-five years of age were enrolled and drafted in the first class, he might be discharged by a federal court on habeas corpus.

2. A person illegally conscripted into the federal army may be discharged on habeas corpus.

[Cited in Brightley’s Dig. 51, 440, to the points as given above. Nowhere reported: opinion not now accessible. Decided by CADWALA-DEE., District Judge.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Akmy — Liability to Draft — Habeas Corpus.

1. Under the act of March 3, 1863, § 3 (12 Stat. 731], if a married man over thirty-five years of age were enrolled and drafted in the first class, he might be discharged by a federal court on habeas corpus.

2. A person illegally conscripted into the federal army may be discharged on habeas corpus.

[Cited in Brightley’s Dig. 51, 440, to the points as given above. Nowhere reported: opinion not now accessible. Decided by CADWALA-DEE., District Judge.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 F. Cas. 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stingles-case-paed-1863.