Stingle v. Hawkins

8 Blackf. 435, 1847 Ind. LEXIS 62
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided July 7, 1847·Published

Opinion

A VENDOR of certain town lots gave the vendee a title-bond conditioned for the making of a deed for the lots on payment of certain notes, which were taken for thex purchase-money and were payable two years after date. Held, that a suit on the notes would not lie, unless the vendor had made or [436] offered to make a deed for the lots, or could show a sufficient reason for his failure to do so. — Leonard v. Bates, 1 Blackf. 172.—Owen v. Norris, 5 id. 479.—Burrows v. Yount, 6 id. 458.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stingle v. Hawkins, 8 Blackf. 435, 1847 Ind. LEXIS 62 (Ind. 1847).

8 Blackf. 435 (Stingle v. Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leonard v. Bates
1 Blackf. 172 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1822)