Stingle v. Hawkins
This text of 8 Blackf. 435 (Stingle v. Hawkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A VENDOR of certain town lots gave the vendee a title-bond conditioned for the making of a deed for the lots on payment of certain notes, which were taken for thex purchase-money and were payable two years after date. Held, that a suit on the notes would not lie, unless the vendor had made or [436]*436offered to make a deed for the lots, or could show a sufficient reason for his failure to do so. — Leonard v. Bates, 1 Blackf. 172.—Owen v. Norris, 5 id. 479.—Burrows v. Yount, 6 id. 458.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Blackf. 435, 1847 Ind. LEXIS 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stingle-v-hawkins-ind-1847.