Stines v. Carton
129 A. 251, 98 N.J. Eq. 415, 13 Stock. 415, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 609
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below bj7 Vice-Chancellor Poster.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Min-turn, Kalisoi-i, Black, Katzenba ci-i, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, MoGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Parker, Campbell, JJ. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stines v. Carton, 129 A. 251, 98 N.J. Eq. 415, 13 Stock. 415, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 609 (N.J. 1925).
129 A. 251 (Stines v. Carton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kelly v. Kelly
35 A.2d 618 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1944)
Hanstein v. Kelly
24 A.2d 386 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1942)
Cutts v. Najdrowski
191 A. 867 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1937)
Rebmann v. Commissioner
18 B.T.A. 1265 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1930)