Stine v. Jain

Supreme Court of Florida

Stine v. Jain

873 So. 2d 326, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 204, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 644, 2004 WL 905754

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 29, 2004

DocketNo. SC02-2595

StatusPublished

This text of 873 So. 2d 326 (Stine v. Jain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stine v. Jain, 873 So. 2d 326, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 204, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 644, 2004 WL 905754 (Fla. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After receiving jurisdictional briefs from the parties pursuant to Rule 9.120(d) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, we accepted jurisdiction to review Jain v. Green Clinic, Inc., 830 So.2d 836 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). After consideration of both the jurisdictional and merits briefs, we have determined that there is no express and direct conflict with any decision of another district court of appeal on the same question of law pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), of the Florida Constitution. Accordingly, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted and hereby dismiss this case.

It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After receiving jurisdictional briefs from the parties pursuant to Rule 9.120(d) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, we accepted jurisdiction to review Jain v. Green Clinic, Inc., 830 So.2d 836 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). After consideration of both the jurisdictional and merits briefs, we have determined that there is no express and direct conflict with any decision of another district court of appeal on the same question of law pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), of the Florida Constitution. Accordingly, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted and hereby dismiss this case.

It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

873 So. 2d 326, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 204, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 644, 2004 WL 905754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stine-v-jain-fla-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack