Stinchomb v. City of Fayetteville

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Stinchomb v. City of Fayetteville

92 S.E. 231, 19 Ga. App. 748, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 341

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 21, 1917

Docket8562

StatusPublished

This text of 92 S.E. 231 (Stinchomb v. City of Fayetteville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stinchomb v. City of Fayetteville, 92 S.E. 231, 19 Ga. App. 748, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 341 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

George, J.

The evidence was sufficient to sustain the judgment of the mayor finding the defendant guilty of disorderly conduct, and no error of law appears. Moreover, the bond attached to and made a part of the petition for certiorari in this case does not meet the requirements of the statute, and the judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to sanction the petition. See Detmermg v. Fayetteville, ante, 747.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George, J.

The evidence was sufficient to sustain the judgment of the mayor finding the defendant guilty of disorderly conduct, and no error of law appears. Moreover, the bond attached to and made a part of the petition for certiorari in this case does not meet the requirements of the statute, and the judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to sanction the petition. See Detmermg v. Fayetteville, ante, 747.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 S.E. 231, 19 Ga. App. 748, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stinchomb-v-city-of-fayetteville-gactapp-1917.