Stinard v. Stinard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stinard v. Stinard

208 A.D.2d 985, 618 N.Y.S.2d 584, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9638

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 13, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 208 A.D.2d 985 (Stinard v. Stinard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stinard v. Stinard, 208 A.D.2d 985, 618 N.Y.S.2d 584, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9638 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Casey, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Tompkins County (Barrett, J.), entered December 16, 1992, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, to find respondent in willful violation of an order of support.

The record provides no basis to disturb Family Court’s dismissal of the petition. Petitioner’s allegations that respondent failed to make certain payments pursuant to orders of support are not supported by any evidence in the record. To the contrary, the only evidence in the record shows no arrears.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III and White, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Casey, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Tompkins County (Barrett, J.), entered December 16, 1992, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, to find respondent in willful violation of an order of support.

The record provides no basis to disturb Family Court’s dismissal of the petition. Petitioner’s allegations that respondent failed to make certain payments pursuant to orders of support are not supported by any evidence in the record. To the contrary, the only evidence in the record shows no arrears.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III and White, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 A.D.2d 985, 618 N.Y.S.2d 584, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stinard-v-stinard-nyappdiv-1994.