Stimson v. . Phifer
This text of 196 S.E. 332 (Stimson v. . Phifer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Whether judgment creditor of heir or devisee is necessary or proper' party to proceeding against decedent’s land for assets is *356 not before us for decision. See Linker v. Linker, ante, 351; Battle v. Duncan, 90 N. C., 546; Byrd v. Byrd, 117 N. C., 523, 23 S. E., 324. Conceding that, upon proper allegations, such judgment creditor is presently entitled to be heard, Wadford v. Davis, 192 N. C., 484, 135 S. E., 353, nevertheless it appears that here he has offered no evidence to support his allegations of fraud or collusion, and his exceptive assignments of error point only to matters available to a coheir or codevisee. Finger v. Finger, 64 N. C., 183.
The record as presented requires no disturbance of the judgment.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 S.E. 332, 213 N.C. 355, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stimson-v-phifer-nc-1938.