Stimson v. Connecticut River Railroad

98 Mass. 83
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 15, 1867·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

Hoar, J.

The defendants had no contract with the plaintiffs. Their contract was with Edwards, the plaintiffs’ agent; and it was a strictly personal contract, for his safe transportation over the railroads, to which the carriage of suitable personal baggage was merely incidental. Edwards had no right to transport merchandise under cover of his personal baggage; much less could he take merchandise in that manner which belonged to other persons, and thereby give them the rights of a contracting party against the defendants. Jordan v. Fall River Railroad Co. 5 Cush. 69. Collins v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 10 Cush. 506. Hawkins v. Hoffman, 6 Hill, 586. The count upon a contract therefore cannot be supported.

Upon the count in tort, the burden of proof was upon the plaintiffs to show the gross negligence upon which their cause of action depended. The party charging negligence must prove it, and no evidence of it was offered. The failure to deliver the valise in Boston was not evidence of negligence, because there was nothing to show that this failure was the consequence of any thing done or omitted on the defendants’ railroad.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stimson v. Connecticut River Railroad, 98 Mass. 83 (Mass. 1867).

98 Mass. 83 (Stimson v. Connecticut River Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

S. Nathan & Co. v. Red Cab, Inc.
118 F.2d 864 (Seventh Circuit, 1941)
Lusk v. Bloch
1917 OK 258 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)
Doerner v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad
130 S.W. 62 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1910)
Toledo & Ohio Central Railroad v. Bowler & Burdick Co.
63 Ohio St. (N.S.) 274 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1900)
Runyan v. Central Railroad
41 A. 367 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1898)
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Knight
33 A. 845 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1895)
Southern Kansas Railway Co. v. Clark
52 Kan. 398 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1893)
Humphreys v. Perry
148 U.S. 627 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Gurney v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. of Canada
14 N.Y.S. 321 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)
Norfolk & Western R. R. v. Irvine
5 S.E. 532 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1888)
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Ferguson
1 Tex. L. R. 458 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1882)
Tex. & Pac. R. R. v. Ferguson
1 White & W. 724 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1882)
Blumantle v. Fitchburg Railroad
127 Mass. 322 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1879)
Alling v. Boston & Albany Railroad
126 Mass. 121 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1879)
Curtis v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
74 N.Y. 116 (New York Court of Appeals, 1878)
Sloman v. Great Western Railway Co.
13 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 546 (New York Supreme Court, 1876)