Stimmel v. Equifax Information Services LLC
Opinion
DELOECCUTMREONNTIC ALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 10/12/2 023 ABRAHAM STIMMEL, Plaintiff, 1:23-cv-1610 (MKV) -against- ORDER EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, and NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANK, Defendants. MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment with respect to Defendant New York Community Bank. [ECF No. 10]. Obtaining a default judgment is ordinarily a two-step process. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55. First, the plaintiff must have the Clerk of Court “enter the [opposing] party’s default” pursuant to Rule 55(a). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Then, the party may move for a default judgment from the Court pursuant to Rule 55(b). Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). “[T]he decision to grant a motion for a default judgment lies in the sound discretion of the trial court.” O’Callaghan v. Sifre, 242 F.R.D. 69, 73 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) (citing Shah v. N.Y. Dep’t of Civil Serv., 168 F.3d 610, 615 (2d Cir. 1999)). The Clerk did not enter a certificate of default in this case and a default judgment may, therefore, not issue. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55; see also Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases Attachment A.1. Moreover, among other things, the motion is not accompanied by a proposed form of judgment or a proposed order to show cause. See Individual Rules of Practice Attachment A. Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, the motion is DENIED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is further requested to terminate docket entry 10.
SO ORDERED. Dated: October 12, 2023 | here New York, New York HON. MARY KAY V¥SKOCIL United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stimmel v. Equifax Information Services LLC (Stimmel v. Equifax Information Services LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.