Stilwell v. Mills

19 Johns. 304
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1822·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It does not appear that the accounts of the guardianship have been settled by the parties, or that any proceedings have been had before the Chancellor, requiring an account of the guardians. Until the accounts are' thus settled, an action cannot be sustained on the bond. A guardianship is a trust, and it peculiarly and exclusively belongs to the Chancellor. (1 Madd. Ch. 269., and the cases there cited.) A guardian must first be called to account, before the surety is liable. 1 Johns. Ch. Rep. 607.

The Chancellor is authorized to make allowances to the guardian, and that Court has every facility for finally adjusting the trust; whereas, in a court of common law, it would be extremely unfit to submit the accounts to the decision of a jury or referees; The true effect of the condition of the bond, is to render an account in the Court of Chancery [305]*305and as this has not been required, the condition of the bond is not violated.

Judgment for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stilwell v. Mills, 19 Johns. 304 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1822).

19 Johns. 304 (Stilwell v. Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coe v. Patterson
122 A.D. 76 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Douglass v. . Ferris
33 N.E. 1041 (New York Court of Appeals, 1893)
French v. . Dauchy
32 N.E. 1041 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Koch v. Le Frois
15 N.Y.S. 928 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)
Hood v. . Hood
85 N.Y. 561 (New York Court of Appeals, 1881)
Girvin v. Hickman
58 How. Pr. 244 (New York Supreme Court, 1879)
Linton v. Walker
8 Fla. 144 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1858)
Farnsworth v. Oliphant
19 Barb. 30 (New York Supreme Court, 1854)
Hunt v. White
1 Ind. 105 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1848)
Salisbury v. Van Hoesen
3 Hill & Den. 77 (New York Supreme Court, 1842)
Newsom v. Dickerson
7 Tenn. 285 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1823)