Stilwell v. Conceco

Fourth Circuit

Stilwell v. Conceco

10 F. App'x 230

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 5, 2001·No. 01-6339·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Stilwell appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing his civil rights complaint alleging that the Appellees were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Stilwell v. Conceco, No. CA-99-1094-AM (E.D.Va. Feb. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Stilwell appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing his civil rights complaint alleging that the Appellees were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Stilwell v. Conceco, No. CA-99-1094-AM (E.D.Va. Feb. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Stilwell v. Conceco, 10 F. App'x 230 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

10 F. App'x 230 (Stilwell v. Conceco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.