Stiltner v. Department of Highways
This text of 15 Ct. Cl. 18 (Stiltner v. Department of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Claimant’s vehicle, a 1973 Dodge Polara, was damaged on November 10, 1982, at approximately 1:30 p.m. as she drove under a State maintained bridge in Fairmont, Marion County, West Virginia. Claimant alleges that a piece of cement broke off the bridge and landed on her car, damaging the vinyl top and breaking the windshield. The damage was estimated at $453.11.
The State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of motorists travelling on its highways. Adkins v. Sims, 130 W.Va. 645, 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). However, the respondent has the duty to use reasonable care to maintain streets and bridges in a safe condition. This Court previously granted an award in a claim, wherein the claimant’s vehicle was damaged by concrete falling from a bridge owned and maintained by the respondent. See Lynch v. Dept. of Highways, 13 Ct.Cl. 187 (1980). In the instant case, the Court is of the opinion that the respondent has not met the duty of care required in the maintenance of a bridge, and, therefore makes an award to the claimant.
Award of $453.11.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 Ct. Cl. 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stiltner-v-department-of-highways-wvctcl-1983.