Stilphen v. Ware

California Supreme Court

Stilphen v. Ware

45 Cal. 110

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1872

DocketNo. 3,366

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 45 Cal. 110 (Stilphen v. Ware) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stilphen v. Ware, 45 Cal. 110 (Cal. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court:

It is conceded that irrespective of the judgment rendered against the corporation itself, the cause of action stated in the complaint is barred by limitation, and if this be so, it is clear that the judgment did not of itself operate to prolong the time in which an action might be brought against the defendants as stockholders of the corporation. (Davidson v. Rankin, 34 Cal. 503; Larrabee v. Baldwin, 35 Cal. 168; Young v. Rosenbaum, 39 Cal. 646.)

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

It is conceded that irrespective of the judgment rendered against the corporation itself, the cause of action stated in the complaint is barred by limitation, and if this be so, it is clear that the judgment did not of itself operate to prolong the time in which an action might be brought against the defendants as stockholders of the corporation. (Davidson v. Rankin, 34 Cal. 503; Larrabee v. Baldwin, 35 Cal. 168; Young v. Rosenbaum, 39 Cal. 646.)

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 Cal. 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stilphen-v-ware-cal-1872.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack