Stillwell v. Harris

8 Ky. 342, 1 A.K. Marsh. 342, 1818 Ky. LEXIS 135
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedOctober 15, 1818
StatusPublished

This text of 8 Ky. 342 (Stillwell v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stillwell v. Harris, 8 Ky. 342, 1 A.K. Marsh. 342, 1818 Ky. LEXIS 135 (Ky. Ct. App. 1818).

Opinion

Judge Owslev

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error brought to reverse a judgment of the court below, dismissing the plaintiff’s traverse to an in* quest taken under the act regulating writs of forcible ea-*l‘es ai!t* detainers.

The justice, before whom the inquest was taken, having returned to court a bond, subscribed by the traverser and jjjg seCnrity, conditioned for the faithful prosecution of the ‘«'averse, and purporting to have been delivered on the day the traverse appears to have been taken, we are of opinion [343]*343t&at, although the record returned by the justice, contains no statement of the security having been approved of, and the bond executed before him, the court below ought not, for that cause, to have dismissed the traverse.

Pope for appellant.

The judgment must therefore be reversed with cost, the Cause remanded,,and further proceedings had, not inconsistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Ky. 342, 1 A.K. Marsh. 342, 1818 Ky. LEXIS 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stillwell-v-harris-kyctapp-1818.