Stillwell Theatre, Inc. v. Kaplan

235 A.D. 738
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgments unanimously affirmed, with costs. The evidence amply justified the finding that the Empire State Motion Picture Operators Union, Inc., is a Iona fide labor union; that there were valid, binding and subsisting contracts of employment for definite periods of time between the plaintiffs and that union at the time the defendant conducted its picketing of the theatres of the plaintiffs, and that this picketing was conducted with knowledge on the part of the defendant of the existence of such contracts. Such orderly picketing with truthful placards was wrongful, although the means employed were otherwise lawful, because such acts were indulged in to attain a wrongful and, therefore, an unlawful purpose, to wit, the breach of contracts of employment for fixed and definite periods of time. (Roosevelt Amusement Corp. v. Empire State Motion Picture Operators Union, Inc., 231 App. Div. 872; Carnation Photoplay Co., Inc., v. Basson, 216 id. 769; Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. Mitchell, 245 U. S. 229; Hornstein v. Podwitz, [739] 254 N. Y. 443, 448; Lamb v. Cheney & Son, 227 id. 418, 422; Altman v. Schlesinger, 204 App. Div. 513; Schlesinger v. Quinto, 201 id. 487.) Present —■ Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, J.J. [140 Misc. 142.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stillwell Theatre, Inc. v. Kaplan, 235 A.D. 738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

235 A.D. 738 (Stillwell Theatre, Inc. v. Kaplan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Esco Operating Corp. v. Kaplan
144 Misc. 646 (New York Supreme Court, 1932)