Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Stills v. State

Stills v. State

190 So. 3d 223, 2016 WL 1707712, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6517
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 28, 2016
DocketNo. 1D16-1530
StatusPublished

This text of 190 So. 3d 223 (Stills v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stills v. State, 190 So. 3d 223, 2016 WL 1707712, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6517 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

SWANSON, OSTERHAUS, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 So. 3d 223, 2016 WL 1707712, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stills-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.