Stillman v. Whitney
1 How. Pr. 243
This text of 1 How. Pr. 243 (Stillman v. Whitney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stillman v. Whitney, 1 How. Pr. 243 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).
Opinion
Granted the motion on the ground, that plaintiff’s attorney had admitted the service of the plea, and did not return it, although he had informed defendant’s attorney, when it was served, he thought it bad, but gave him no notice that he should disregard it until he had entered his default some six or seven days afterwards. Motion granted, costs to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stillman-v-whitney-nysupct-1845.