Stillman v. Suntrust Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stillman v. Suntrust Bank

861 So. 2d 101, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19204, 2003 WL 22956743

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 17, 2003

DocketNo. 4D4D03-1249

StatusPublished

This text of 861 So. 2d 101 (Stillman v. Suntrust Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stillman v. Suntrust Bank, 861 So. 2d 101, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19204, 2003 WL 22956743 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There were errors in the procedure by which the probate court entered a final judgment determining that appellant’s petition to revoke probate was not timely filed. However, appellant received a full and fair evidentiary hearing on the issue. We conclude that appellant waived the right to rely on the procedural defect of which he complains by tacitly consenting to the procedure employed by the court. We affirm as to all issues.

WARNER, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There were errors in the procedure by which the probate court entered a final judgment determining that appellant’s petition to revoke probate was not timely filed. However, appellant received a full and fair evidentiary hearing on the issue. We conclude that appellant waived the right to rely on the procedural defect of which he complains by tacitly consenting to the procedure employed by the court. We affirm as to all issues.

WARNER, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

861 So. 2d 101, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19204, 2003 WL 22956743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stillman-v-suntrust-bank-fladistctapp-2003.