Stillman v. Roosa

174 N.E.2d 751, 9 N.Y.2d 778
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 23, 1961
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 174 N.E.2d 751 (Stillman v. Roosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stillman v. Roosa, 174 N.E.2d 751, 9 N.Y.2d 778 (N.Y. 1961).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voórhis, Burke and Foster.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Queensbury Ass'n v. Town Board of the Town of Queensbury
141 A.D.2d 997 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 N.E.2d 751, 9 N.Y.2d 778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stillman-v-roosa-ny-1961.