Stillman v. Johnson

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Stillman v. Johnson

55 N.J. Eq. 592

CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery

DecidedMarch 15, 1897

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 55 N.J. Eq. 592 (Stillman v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stillman v. Johnson, 55 N.J. Eq. 592 (N.J. Ct. App. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Cijriam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

Stillman v. Johnson—

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Collins, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon — 13.

For reversal — None.

Freshmuth v. Johnson—

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Collins, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon — 13.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Cijriam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

Stillman v. Johnson—

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Collins, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon — 13.

For reversal — None.

Freshmuth v. Johnson—

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Collins, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon — 13.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 N.J. Eq. 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stillman-v-johnson-njch-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack