Stilling v. Skankey

784 P.2d 144, 122 Utah Adv. Rep. 6, 1989 Utah LEXIS 147, 1989 WL 141735
Utah Supreme Court·Decided November 27, 1989·No. 880197·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from an order of the trial court, dismissing with prejudice his cross-claim for indemnity against appellees on the ground that the seven-year statute of repose, Utah Code Ann. § 78-12-25.5 (1987), (amended 1988), cut off appellant’s right of action against the architects and engineers from whom appellant sought indemnification in a tort claim.

In Horton v. Goldminer’s Daughter, 785 P.2d 1087 (Utah 1989) and Sun Valley Water Beds of Utah v. Herm Hughes & Son, Inc., 782 P.2d 188 (Utah 1989), this Court held that the Utah architects and builders statute of repose is unconstitutional under the open courts provision of article I, section 11 of the Utah Constitution.

Those two cases are dispositive here, and the case is remanded to the trial court for a trial on the merits of appellant’s cross-claim.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stilling v. Skankey, 784 P.2d 144, 122 Utah Adv. Rep. 6, 1989 Utah LEXIS 147, 1989 WL 141735 (Utah 1989).

784 P.2d 144 (Stilling v. Skankey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Corkill v. Knowles
955 P.2d 438 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1998)
Phipps v. Irby Const. Co.
636 So. 2d 353 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1993)
Velarde v. Board of Review of the Industrial Commission
831 P.2d 123 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1992)
STATE EX REL. WYOMING WORKERS'COMP. DIV. v. Halstead
795 P.2d 760 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1990)
Wrolstad v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF UTAH
786 P.2d 243 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1990)