Stilley v. Henson

26 S.W.3d 786, 342 Ark. 123, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 420
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedSeptember 22, 2000
Docket00-1060
StatusPublished

This text of 26 S.W.3d 786 (Stilley v. Henson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stilley v. Henson, 26 S.W.3d 786, 342 Ark. 123, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 420 (Ark. 2000).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant Oscar Stilley moves this court to advance this appeal concerning an election contest on our docket and to establish an expedited briefing schedule. The Election Code provides that it is our duty to advance appeals of election contests. See Ark. Code Ann. § 7-5-804(b) (Repl. 2000). We have had occasion to expedite consideration of election appeals in the past, which involved setting a schedule for filing the record and for briefing. See, e.g., Heathscott v. Raff, 334 Ark. 224, 971 S.W.2d 266 (1998) (per curiam). We grant the motion to expedite the appeal and to set the briefing schedule. The record in this matter and appellant’s brief have been filed. Responsive briefs shall be filed by the parties no later than September 28, 2000. There will be no reply briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heathscott v. Raff
971 S.W.2d 266 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 S.W.3d 786, 342 Ark. 123, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stilley-v-henson-ark-2000.