Still v. Still
This text of 835 So. 2d 376 (Still v. Still) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sandra STILL, Appellant,
v.
Arthur STILL, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Welbaum, Guernsey, Hingston, Greenleaf & Gregory, Coral Gables, and Robert J. Black, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Hersch & Talisman and Patrice A. Talisman, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., FLETCHER and SHEVIN, JJ.
SHEVIN, Judge.
Sandra Still, former wife, appeals a final dissolution judgment that vacates a mediation settlement agreement. We affirm.
The court properly granted the former husband's motion to set the agreement aside. The evidence presented below demonstrated: that the former wife made false statements concerning a specific material factto wit, that she and the daughter would remain in the marital home so the child could grow up there; that the former wife knew the representation was false; that the former wife intended the representation to induce reliance by the former husband; and that the former husband was injured by his reliance on the representation. Lopez-Infante v. Union Central Life Ins. Co., 809 So.2d 13, 15 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 832 so.2d 106 (Fla. 2002). Therefore, we affirm the final judgment in all respects.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
835 So. 2d 376, 2003 WL 183502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/still-v-still-fladistctapp-2003.