Still v. State

158 S.E. 336, 43 Ga. App. 204, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 250
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 14, 1931
Docket21213
StatusPublished

This text of 158 S.E. 336 (Still v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Still v. State, 158 S.E. 336, 43 Ga. App. 204, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 250 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the special grounds of the motion for a new trial are without merit. The charge of the court was fair and sufficiently full and was not subject to any of the criticisms urged against it. The refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 S.E. 336, 43 Ga. App. 204, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/still-v-state-gactapp-1931.