Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Still v. State

Still v. State

866 So. 2d 1270, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2920, 2004 WL 401782
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 5, 2004
DocketNo. 5D03-3699
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 866 So. 2d 1270 (Still v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Still v. State, 866 So. 2d 1270, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2920, 2004 WL 401782 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The denial of the defendant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion is affirmed except as to the issue of appropriate prison time credit due the defendant. ■ Because this issue was not considered by the trial court, the order is reversed as to this issue and remanded for the trial court to address the prison time credit issue and either attach portions of the record to show the defendant received all the credit he is due or award the proper credit.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, C.J., ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hodge v. State
866 So. 2d 1270 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
866 So. 2d 1270, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2920, 2004 WL 401782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/still-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.