Stiles v. Spaulding

New York Supreme Court

Stiles v. Spaulding

2 How. Pr. 191

DecidedJune 15, 1846

StatusPublished

This text of 2 How. Pr. 191 (Stiles v. Spaulding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stiles v. Spaulding, 2 How. Pr. 191 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).

Pincite

Opinion

Jewett, Justice.

The common pleas reversed a justice’s judgment on certiorari, from which a writ of error is brought, notice of which was served on the attorney for the defendant in error prior to the service of notice of this motion. The plaintiff in error did not procure and file with the clerk of the common pleas certificate of counsel, pursuant to 2 R. S., p. 597, § 32. This was unnecessary in this case. The plaintiff in error procured and filed a certificate of the first judge of the common pleas, pursuant to the act of 1836, chap. 794. Motion denied with $7 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jewett, Justice.

The common pleas reversed a justice’s judgment on certiorari, from which a writ of error is brought, notice of which was served on the attorney for the defendant in error prior to the service of notice of this motion. The plaintiff in error did not procure and file with the clerk of the common pleas certificate of counsel, pursuant to 2 R. S., p. 597, § 32. This was unnecessary in this case. The plaintiff in error procured and filed a certificate of the first judge of the common pleas, pursuant to the act of 1836, chap. 794. Motion denied with $7 costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 How. Pr. 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stiles-v-spaulding-nysupct-1846.