Stiles v. Jackson, ex dem. Ten Eyck
1 Wend. 316
Opinion
[317] By the Court,
The infants are entitled to defend by guardian, as landlords of the premises. Every person may be considered as a landlord for this purpose, whose title is connected to and consistent with the possession of the occupier. (Adams on Eject. 230. Burr. 1290.) And when the lessor in ejectment claims an interest inconsistent with the title of the landlord, the latter may defend.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stiles v. Jackson, ex dem. Ten Eyck, 1 Wend. 316 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).
1 Wend. 316 (Stiles v. Jackson, ex dem. Ten Eyck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sand v. Church
32 A.D. 139 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
Stribling v. Prettyman
57 Ill. 371 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1870)
Sampson v. Ohleyer
22 Cal. 200 (California Supreme Court, 1863)
Williams v. Brunton
8 Ill. 600 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1846)
Jackson v. M'Evoy
1 Cai. Cas. 151 (New York Supreme Court, 1803)