Stiles v. Jackson, ex dem. Ten Eyck

New York Supreme Court

Stiles v. Jackson, ex dem. Ten Eyck

1 Wend. 316

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1828

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 1 Wend. 316 (Stiles v. Jackson, ex dem. Ten Eyck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stiles v. Jackson, ex dem. Ten Eyck, 1 Wend. 316 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).

Pincite

Opinion

[317]*317By the Court,

Savage, Ck„ J,

The infants are entitled to defend by guardian, as landlords of the premises. Every person may be considered as a landlord for this purpose, whose title is connected to and consistent with the possession of the occupier. (Adams on Eject. 230. Burr. 1290.) And when the lessor in ejectment claims an interest inconsistent with the title of the landlord, the latter may defend.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[317]*317By the Court,

Savage, Ck„ J,

The infants are entitled to defend by guardian, as landlords of the premises. Every person may be considered as a landlord for this purpose, whose title is connected to and consistent with the possession of the occupier. (Adams on Eject. 230. Burr. 1290.) And when the lessor in ejectment claims an interest inconsistent with the title of the landlord, the latter may defend.

Motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Wend. 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stiles-v-jackson-ex-dem-ten-eyck-nysupct-1828.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack