Stiles v. Chapman
This text of 7 Ga. 1 (Stiles v. Chapman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court. —
delivering the opinion,
To carry fully into effect these requirements of the fundamental law, with other things, the 11th Rule of this Court was adopted. That Rule declares, that when cases are called for hearing and there is no appearance by the plaintiff in errrr, the defendant may have the plaintiff called and move the Court to dismiss the writ; or he may open the record and pray for an affirmance of the judgment, and in case the writ is dismissed or the judgment affirmed, the plaintiff in error shall pay the costs. This cause was duly called for hearing, and in its proper order, and there being no appearance for the- plaintiff in error, and the plaintiff himself being first called, the counsel for the defendant opened the record, and prayed the Court that the judgment below be affirmed.
Let the judgment of the Court below, therefore, stand affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Ga. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stiles-v-chapman-ga-1849.