Stigall v. Thompson

Fourth Circuit

Stigall v. Thompson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 12, 2004

Docket03-7714

StatusUnpublished

This text of Stigall v. Thompson (Stigall v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stigall v. Thompson, (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7714

COLEMAN A. STIGALL, III,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LEVESTER THOMPSON, Physician, Nottoway Correctional Center; NASEER MOBASHAR, Doctor, Buckingham Correctional Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-1281-7)

Submitted: March 31, 2004 Decided: April 12, 2004

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Coleman A. Stigall, III, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Joseph McNelis, III, John David McChesney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Coleman A. Stigall, III, appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Stigall v. Thompson, No. CA-02-1281-7 (W.D. Va.

Sept. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI